Week 14 xG Matchup Rankings

Week 14 xG Matchup Rankings

With unlimited transfers this season, match ups are more important than ever. The question is how to evaluate match ups, especially if you’re only an aspiring Armchair Analyst and not yet the real thing. The answer? Expected Goals (xG).

What are expected goals (xG)

The idea behind xG is simple. Every shot is awarded a probability of scoring based on the position on the field and the game situation, based on giant databases of shots from years and years of data. Then at the end of the game all the xGs from the individual shots are added up to generate the team’s xG for that game. This metric is a useful measure of the teams overall attacking or defending play, more so than just looking at how many goals a team has scored or allowed. If you’d like to learn more, there’s a nice video by MLS to explain further:

http://www.mlssoccer.com/post/2017/04/24/what-are-expected-goals-learn-what-you-need-know-about-statistic

How to use these rankings

The rankings below use the xG metric to rank the match ups each week to help you determine which teams you should try to choose your attackers or defenders from. Each teams score is an average of their xG/g and their opponent’s xG/g separated out into offense/defense and home/away match ups.  The game by game xG numbers are taken from Ben Baer’s weekly xG article. At this time, these rankings only include the xG for weeks 1-12 because Ben Baer has not published his weekly xG articles, and with the Wednesday double game week I wanted to get the rankings out to you. I will update the rankings when he publishes his article. 

The first column is the team in the rankings, the second column is the teams opponent for this week (for double game weeks, both games are included separately), the third column is whether the ranked team is home or away, the fourth column is the the ranked team’s offense score this week (the higher the better), and the ranked  teams defensive score (the lower the better). For reference, the average match up on the season has an offensive and defensive xG/xG allowed of 1.25 xG/g. So offensive scores higher than 1.25 and defensive scores lower than 1.25 are better than average match ups.

Week 13 xG Matchup Rankings

TeamOpponentH/AOFFDEF
Atlanta UnitedVANA0.891.4
Chicago FireOCSCA1.231.26
Colorado RapidsCLBH1.311.14
Columbus Crew**SEAH1.411.2
Columbus Crew**COLA1.141.31
DC United**LAGH1.271.12
DC United**OCSC A1.041.38
FC DallasRSLH1.450.96
Houston Dynamo**RSLH1.871.04
Houston Dynamo**SEAA0.991.7
LA GalaxyDCUA1.121.27
Minnesota UnitedSKCA1.041.96
Montreal ImpactNYRBH1.71
NE Revolution**TORH1.521.09
NE Revolution**NYCFC A0.921.26
NY Red BullsMTL A11.7
NYCFC**NERH1.260.92
NYCFC**PHI H1.140.84
Orlando City**DCUH1.381.04
Orlando City**CHIH1.261.23
Philadelphia UnionNYCFC A0.841.14
Portland TimbersSJEH1.341.07
RSL**HOUA1.041.87
RSL**FCDA0.961.45
San Jose EarthquakesPORA1.071.34
Seattle Sounders**HOUH1.70.99
Seattle Sounders**CLBA1.21.41
Sporting Kansas CityMNUH1.961.04
TorontoNERA1.091.52
Vancouver Whitecaps FCATLH1.40.89

DGW Team Rankings

This week I’ve also averaged the match ups for the just the DGW teams to give an idea of which are the best teams to choose from over the two match ups.

TeamH/AOFFDEF
Columbus Crew**H/A1.271.26
DC United**A/H1.161.25
Houston Dynamo**H/A1.431.37
NE Revolution**A/H1.221.18
NYCFC**H/H1.20.88
Orlando City**H/H1.321.14
RSL**A/A11.66
Seattle Sounders**A/H1.451.2

Week 13 rankings notes

  • So for this week, the rankings suggest that:
    • Seattle, Houston, and Orlando and Columbus are above average offenses over their combined two games.
    • NYCFC, Orlando, New England, and Seattle are above average defense over their combined games.

About Kyle Mcelhinny

Scientist by day, soccer fan by night. Nerd always. Using stats to overcome my lack of knowledge about the beautiful game.

Check Also

2019 Round 2 Predictions and Power Rankings

The following predictions are based on the ELO ranking system. This system was first used …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *